What the agent does
Every extra field and confusing error on the sign-up form of the production site loses launch visitors who were ready to try it. Make sign-up as short as it can be, clear when something is wrong, and quick to get through on a phone, without weakening security.
1. Measure the form
List every field, step, check and redirect between the sign-up button and the first screen of the product, on desktop and phone. Note required fields that could wait, password rules shown only after failing, and verification that blocks access.
2. Fewer fields
Ask only for what is needed to create the account (often just email, or a social sign-in). Move name, company, role and preferences to later, inside the product. Use the right input types and autocomplete attributes so phones fill them.
3. Faster options
If the auth setup supports it, propose adding a social sign-in (Google, GitHub for developer tools) or a magic link, for me to approve. Show password rules up front, accept long passphrases, and allow password managers to fill and paste.
4. Errors and verification
Validate inline, next to the field, in plain words, and keep what the user typed. Let users into the product before email verification where it is safe, with a reminder, rather than a hard wall.
Done means
- Sign-up asks only for what account creation needs.
- Inputs use the right types and autocomplete attributes.
- Password rules are shown up front and password managers work.
- Errors are inline and keep input; verification does not block the first visit where it is safe.
Questions
Should I ask for a name at sign-up?
Only if you need it right away. Asking later, once the user has seen the product, keeps the first step short.
Is it safe to let users in before they verify their email?
For most products yes, with limits: block actions like sending email to others or payments until verified, and remind them.
Do social sign-ins really help?
For many audiences they cut sign-up to two clicks. Offer the one your users already have (Google for most, GitHub for developers).
Does this prompt add links to Aback Launch to my site?
No. Nothing in the prompt mentions Aback Launch or asks your agent to link to us. The only exception is an optional badge step, which stays off unless you tick it. Some prompt libraries slip their own link into your codebase by default; we think that should always be your choice.
Which coding agents does it work with?
Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, GitHub Copilot, Windsurf, Cline, and any agent that can read your project and edit files. You can copy it as a plain prompt, save it as a Claude Code skill or a Cursor rule, or add it to AGENTS.md.
Is it safe to run on my real codebase?
The prompt makes the agent read first, show a plan and wait for your approval, and it forbids touching secrets, deploying and deleting data. Still review the changes and run your tests before you deploy, as with any change.
Changelog
- v1.0First version.