What the agent does
I am launching the production site soon. Audit this codebase the way a careful reviewer would on the day before a launch, rank every problem by how much it would hurt the launch, and then fix the blockers with me. Strangers will arrive from launch sites, social posts and search all at once: anything broken, slow, unclear or untrustworthy costs signups that do not come back.
1. Map the site
List every public route or page template, the shared layout(s), where metadata is set, and how the site is built and served. Note any pages that need sign-in. This map is what you audit against, so show it to me first.
2. Audit, without changing anything
Check each area below. For every problem, record the file, what is wrong, why it matters on launch day, and the fix.
- Search and sharing: a unique
<title>and meta description on every public page; one canonical URL per page; Open Graph and X card tags with a 1200 x 630 image that exists; a favicon and apple-touch-icon;robots.txtand an XML sitemap that list the real public pages and no private ones. - AI assistants: the main content is in the server-rendered HTML (not only after JavaScript runs); the homepage says in plain words what the product is and who it is for; there is an Organization or SoftwareApplication JSON-LD block.
- Errors: a real 404 page that returns status 404 (not 200); a 500 page; no broken internal links; no console errors on the main pages; forms that show a useful error when they fail.
- Speed: oversized images, images without width and height, render-blocking scripts in
<head>, fonts loaded withoutfont-display, and anything that will be slow under a burst of traffic. - Trust: HTTPS everywhere with HTTP redirecting to it; a privacy policy and terms linked in the footer; a contact route; security headers (
Strict-Transport-Security,X-Content-Type-Options, aContent-Security-Policyor a plan for one,Referrer-Policy). - Conversion: the main call to action is visible without scrolling on a phone; sign-up works end to end; the pricing page, if there is one, matches what checkout charges.
- Search and sharing: a unique
3. Rank the findings
Sort everything into three groups and show me the list before fixing:
- P0, blocks the launch: broken flows, wrong or missing titles and share images on the pages people will share, a 404 page that returns 200, private pages in the sitemap, anything that loses data or leaks it.
- P1, costs signups or rankings: slow pages, missing structured data, unclear homepage copy, missing canonicals.
- P2, polish: everything else.
Give each finding a size (minutes, an hour, more) so I can choose.
4. Fix the P0s, then the P1s I approve
Fix at the source: a missing description belongs in the shared metadata helper with a per-page value, not pasted into each page. After each fix, re-check that item and tick it off in the list. Stop and ask before any fix that changes copy the visitor reads.
Done means
- The audit list exists, ranked P0, P1 and P2, with a file and a fix for every item.
- Every P0 is fixed or explicitly deferred by me.
- Every public page has a unique title, a description, a canonical URL and working share tags.
- An unknown URL returns a 404 status with a helpful page.
- The build and existing tests still pass.
Questions
How is this different from running an SEO checker?
A checker reads one page from the outside. This prompt reads your codebase, so it finds the cause (a layout with no description, a sitemap built from the wrong list) and fixes it once for every page. Run a checker afterwards to confirm the live result.
Will the agent change my site without asking?
No. The prompt tells the agent to map the site, audit without changing anything, show you a ranked list, and wait for your approval before each fix. It also lists things it must never do, like editing secrets or deploying.
How long before launch should I run it?
A week before is ideal: enough time to fix the P0s and P1s calmly. Run it again the day before to catch anything new.
Does it work with no-code builders?
Pick Webflow, Framer or WordPress as your framework and the page gives you the same audit as a checklist you can follow in the builder's settings.
Does this prompt add links to Aback Launch to my site?
No. Nothing in the prompt mentions Aback Launch or asks your agent to link to us. The only exception is an optional badge step, which stays off unless you tick it. Some prompt libraries slip their own link into your codebase by default; we think that should always be your choice.
Which coding agents does it work with?
Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, GitHub Copilot, Windsurf, Cline, and any agent that can read your project and edit files. You can copy it as a plain prompt, save it as a Claude Code skill or a Cursor rule, or add it to AGENTS.md.
Is it safe to run on my real codebase?
The prompt makes the agent read first, show a plan and wait for your approval, and it forbids touching secrets, deploying and deleting data. Still review the changes and run your tests before you deploy, as with any change.
Changelog
- v1.0First version.